So Air Canada no longer wants its employees staying in downtown Winnipeg. How do those of us with a passion for the downtown react?
I don’t think there is much comfort in painting a more positive picture even though that may be our first reaction. Air Canada has declared its judgment to the world and the media has assured the message was heard. Perception is more important than reality.
There are always interesting ideas about how to better deploy our police services—horses, buffalo coats and beat patrols—the Chief has undoubtedly considered them all. Political leaders of every stripe are strongly supportive and police budgets are voted an ever increasing share of public resources. In addition, the public and private sectors have both invested in the downtown through major projects like the MTS Centre or the new Hydro Headquarters as well as countless smaller ones. Philanthropy is also doing its part. Support for the Human Rights Museum symbolizes the community’s generosity—The Winnipeg Foundation alone granted $6 million. The Foundation has invested heavily in Central Park, Old Market Square, the Red River Culinary School—the list of projects is very long. And other charities are equally committed.
Despite Air Canada’s conclusion about our downtown, my view is that we are making progress. But to change the situation in a profound way, we need 2000 new condos on the “walkway system”. There are certainly available sites for major residential blocks—for example, over Portage Place, along Graham, over Winnipeg Square, north of the Canwest Building or east of the Fairmont Hotel.
It would take very significant government subsidies and it is not easy for public policy to support private housing. But the advantages accompanying such development would be equally significant. From a safety perspective alone, several thousand residents constantly moving throughout the downtown and connected by our all-weather walkway system would be transformative. Residents would give more meaningful voice to the most obvious needs which mostly relate to root causes. And their presence would not only bring new business (groceries, dry cleaning, etc) but equally important, shore up the business that already exists. Of course, whatever the required subsidy may be, investing public money into the capital construction of new condo units will lever a more significant private investment. It will create jobs and an increased tax base. I haven’t looked recently at how much PST, income tax or other provincial revenue is generated by the construction of a $350,000 condo unit, but at least some of the subsidy would be immediately recovered.
We all want a city where community life flourishes. The Air Canada decision is really a message saying that whatever progress has been made and however well intentioned our efforts to date may be, the results are not sufficient. Setting a goal of 2000 condo units may be entirely arbitrary but can there be any doubt that such a major residential initiative would be a game-changer for the downtown? Hopefully the private and public sectors will seriously consider this option knowing the charitable sector will continue to play a supportive role appropriately focused on the amenities and social services of the downtown area.


